insert_car
06-01-2010, 08:36 PM
So with all of the blah blah FINALLY coming out after EVERYONE IN THE WORLD knew half of the 2004 USC team was getting paid....i think they will eventually strip usc of the championship and reggie of the heisman. which leaves the question, will they crown a new champion or leave in N/A?
Many articles have been written about giving it to the deserving Tigers and said if it was left to a vote the general thought is that auburn would be awarded the title. the bad part about all of this is that lames would still say we didn't win the title that year. if they did award us the title, i would accept and be happy about it but it still pisses me off that we weren't able to play in the title game which was the worst lop sided title game EVER. OK didn't deserve it...period.
just wondering what your thoughts are on the topic. should we receive the title or no?
Many articles have been written about giving it to the deserving Tigers and said if it was left to a vote the general thought is that auburn would be awarded the title. the bad part about all of this is that lames would still say we didn't win the title that year. if they did award us the title, i would accept and be happy about it but it still pisses me off that we weren't able to play in the title game which was the worst lop sided title game EVER. OK didn't deserve it...period.
just wondering what your thoughts are on the topic. should we receive the title or no?