PDA

View Full Version : Apex'i SAFC


Mitsubeatshi
01-27-2004, 02:32 PM
Hey, I'm looking to get the Apex'i Super Air Flow Converter and was wondering if anyone out there has ahd any experience with them. Are they worth the money?

Frosty_DUB
01-27-2004, 02:49 PM
my friend is gonna run one on his 500whp supra. I guess they are.

WiggiE
01-27-2004, 04:41 PM
Depends on what you are using it on. Remember piggy-backs are only band-aids.

BTW, those SAFC II's look ill.

AadosX
01-27-2004, 05:57 PM
I thought it was Super Air Fuel Controller? Hrmm... I guess I was wrong.

Jess
01-27-2004, 06:33 PM
Nope, its controller. I run an S-AFC II. If you're cheap, just get a regular ol S-AFC. The II isnt that much better

AadosX
01-27-2004, 10:15 PM
Yeah, so that's one... but is it Air Fuel (like I said) or Air Flow (him)?

WiggiE
01-27-2004, 11:14 PM
Mitsubeatshi is correct. It is "Super Air Flow Converter".


Link to the SAFC manual on Apexi's website:
http://www.apexi-usa.com/productdocumentation/electronics_safc_ins.pdf

Jess
01-27-2004, 11:49 PM
yep, it doesnt directly have anything to do with fuel. It only really works with air. The reason you can richen/lean with it is because the ECU is fooled by the SAFC and reacts by either adding or removing fuel.

AadosX
01-28-2004, 12:15 AM
Ah ok, good info, thanks guys.

CPMaverick
01-28-2004, 01:14 AM
Jess is wrong-

Those things are fuckin magic, and don't let anyone tell you different.

:shock:

cheappower82
02-04-2004, 12:45 PM
S-AFCII saved my @ss at the dyno. I gained ~30 RWHP and ~40 RWTQ from tuning with the piggy-back. Not as nice as a standalone, but much more user friendly and cheaper. Ebay <$300 shipped

eSpyder99
02-04-2004, 04:53 PM
Hey, I'm looking to get the Apex'i Super Air Flow Converter and was wondering if anyone out there has ahd any experience with them. Are they worth the money?

There was a guy at the meeting last night that was trying to sell his... and a bunch of other turbo accesories off of his 2g eclipse. Not sure how to get a hold of him but he might be at the meeting next week, I think OB knows how to get a hold of him so maybe you could go that route.

1.8t
02-04-2004, 07:31 PM
yesh

ActiveAero
02-04-2004, 09:48 PM
Mine was all right. It does fine at taking away fuel but sucks at adding it. It is also inconsistent since all it is going is tricking you air flow sensor by changing the voltage it recieves. I could do back to back runs with the same settings and my AF would jump all over the place. It would still be in the general area, but not near as precise as I would like.

I'd go standalone. Spend the money now and save headaches later.

A418t81
02-05-2004, 07:23 PM
Mine was all right. It does fine at taking away fuel but sucks at adding it. It is also inconsistent since all it is going is tricking you air flow sensor by changing the voltage it recieves. I could do back to back runs with the same settings and my AF would jump all over the place. It would still be in the general area, but not near as precise as I would like.

I'd go standalone. Spend the money now and save headaches later.

You can't add well b/c you have one of them Honduhs that doesn't like to see anything resembling positive pressure ;)

Jess
02-05-2004, 08:28 PM
I dont get it, why cant you add well with it. Doesnt it just change the MAP voltage to the ECU? Shouldnt that be basically the same as more air coming in?

Mitsubeatshi
02-15-2004, 09:39 PM
Exactly, some people just don't know how to use it though,

A418t81
02-15-2004, 10:58 PM
I dont get it, why cant you add well with it. Doesnt it just change the MAP voltage to the ECU? Shouldnt that be basically the same as more air coming in?

Because when you are at WOT, the map is reading, for all intensive purposes, right at atmospheric pressure (no vac). So how exactly are you going to add fuel at WOT on a MAP based system that freaks out as soon as it sees something above 1 ATM? Keep in mind when you add fuel on a map system, you effectively increase the pressure the computer sees.

ActiveAero
02-16-2004, 12:37 AM
I dont get it, why cant you add well with it. Doesnt it just change the MAP voltage to the ECU? Shouldnt that be basically the same as more air coming in?

Because when you are at WOT, the map is reading, for all intensive purposes, right at atmospheric pressure (no vac). So how exactly are you going to add fuel at WOT on a MAP based system that freaks out as soon as it sees something above 1 ATM? Keep in mind when you add fuel on a map system, you effectively increase the pressure the computer sees.

:P Get'm Greyson. I'm sure for other vehicles it could be fine. However it still doesn't do anything but play with fuel. With stand alone you get timing control along with a ton of other features.

CPMaverick
02-16-2004, 02:37 AM
Well I think the idea is to add more fuel THEN get something like a AFC/SAFC/VAFC/KFC or whatever. :roll: :lol:

For example get some bigger injectors and then take fuel away where needed.

And it DOES change timing, timing maps are RPM and MAP based just like fuel maps are.

Still they are not too great a tuning tool since you really have no idea what your changes are doing because they are just telling your car to read a different place on a map with a shape you are clueless about...

ActiveAero
02-16-2004, 12:17 PM
And it DOES change timing, timing maps are RPM and MAP based just like fuel maps are.



Really? I thought timing never changed and that I was still runing 14 degrees at WOT at 9,100 rpms. :P

Of course we all know the ECU will change the timing maps based on sensor input, but the VAFC DOESN'T let you control that independently, which is of course what we are talking about.

Jess
02-16-2004, 12:23 PM
you maybe able to change timing, but not directly.

CPMaverick
02-17-2004, 01:51 AM
You aren't doing shit directly, you are altering airflow numbers and the ECU will interpret that with different fuel AND timing values. Although timing doesn't change much.

You are definitely not directly doing anything with a piggyback, the ECU is still using the same map as always, you are just fooling it into moving to another point on the RPM vs. MAP tables, fuel AND timing. :roll:

WiggiE
02-17-2004, 02:03 AM
And that is why everyone should go to carbs.

CPMaverick
02-17-2004, 02:14 AM
Of course we all know the ECU will change the timing maps based on sensor input, but the VAFC DOESN'T let you control that independently, which is of course what we are talking about.

Yeah I'd be REAL interested to understand a bit better what 'of course' you are talking about. You change fuel by altering MAP values, which in turn has to effect the timing tables the same way, if it "DOESN'T" let you control timing 'independently' then it 'DOESN'T' let you control fuel 'independently' either because they are both effected the same way, buy the same sensor value alterations.

Damn I can't believe the gay-ass graphs on those things fooled so many people.....

Jess
02-17-2004, 09:20 AM
Still they are not too great a tuning tool since you really have no idea what your changes are doing because they are just telling your car to read a different place on a map with a shape you are clueless about...

Well, when you're using it in conjunction with an in-car wideband like I'm doing its a good tuning tool for the money. Where's all this hostility coming from? I dont think anybody's contradicting what you've been saying. I think everybody knows that all it does is modify the MAP/MAF signal to the ECU.

CPMaverick
02-17-2004, 11:26 AM
Yea I'm not saying they aren't worth buying, just that they have limited capabilities. Most of the ricers think they are adding '+40% fuel' with thier AFC and that always pisses me off :lol: because you can not tell how much you are really adding. I figured some of ya'll would know better.

WiggiE
02-17-2004, 05:01 PM
who needs eletronic gizmo's when u can have carbs.......

A418t81
02-17-2004, 05:53 PM
who needs eletronic gizmo's when u can have carbs.......

Who needs anything more than 2000 cc's when you have technology :P

1 Bad 68
02-17-2004, 10:32 PM
V8+forced induction>I4+forced induction

CPMaverick
02-18-2004, 12:15 AM
:lol:

Not sure where you are going with that Wiggie, if what someone has done to their car is the extent of their automotive knowledge, then you are really good at installing CAIs :lol: I never even mentioned carbs.

WiggiE
02-18-2004, 12:31 AM
:lol:

Not sure where you are going with that Wiggie, if what someone has done to their car is the extent of their automotive knowledge, then you are really good at installing CAIs :lol: I never even mentioned carbs.
No where :lol: Just like my post where I told the guy to weld the seat directly to the frame. :lol:

1 Bad 68
02-18-2004, 01:02 AM
:lol:

Not sure where you are going with that Wiggie, if what someone has done to their car is the extent of their automotive knowledge, then you are really good at installing CAIs :lol: I never even mentioned carbs.
No where :lol: Just like my post where I told the guy to weld the seat directly to the frame. :lol:

Is that not how they do it? :? :lol: