View Full Version : Tight pic or what
1BoMeXLeX
02-04-2003, 11:37 PM
http://www.clublexus.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=504258
WiggiE
02-05-2003, 12:03 AM
Yes. Is it me or does the water looked photochopped for effect?
1BoMeXLeX
02-05-2003, 12:04 AM
i dunno
but whatever they did
it worked
WiggiE
02-05-2003, 12:05 AM
Notice how the water is very flat, but yet the image is all blurred like it's wavvy.
1BoMeXLeX
02-05-2003, 12:20 AM
maybe the water has slight ripples that you cant see...because everything else is a solid color
and the car has many differnet colors so it showes the ripples more
eh... im good at bull shit
It might have been...
But, I can tell instantly the type of film they used to take the image. It's Fuji Velvia ISO50 (I used to be a big photography buff, sorry)..
That type of film really would pick up details like that in such clarity. It also gives unbelieveable color in prints. As dubed by the name when you actually see real good prints of it it looks like velvet.
Is that an Aston Martin? (going back to cars)
1BoMeXLeX
02-05-2003, 12:48 AM
yeah... the one from the bond movie
1BoMeXLeX
02-05-2003, 12:49 AM
that film must have to be used on days when it is overcast
because i couldnt imagine having alot of sunlight in the picture
that film must have to be used on days when it is overcast
because i couldnt imagine having alot of sunlight in the picture
Well... Actually you kinda need a bright day..
Film like that has a very slow exposure rate so you need a decent amount of light to actually expose the film. On that day I'd guess they probably had a shutter speed of around 50-150.
You want a longer exposure rate (with the correct iris setting) because you absorb more detail from the photo. Problem being that the longer the shutter is open the more chance you have for movement of the subject or objects around it causing blurring. Which is exactly what happened in the ripples. The ripples don't look clean and crisp because they wern't captured fast enough by the shutter.
Frosty_DUB
02-06-2003, 11:43 AM
It might have been...
But, I can tell instantly the type of film they used to take the image. It's Fuji Velvia ISO50 (I used to be a big photography buff, sorry)..
That type of film really would pick up details like that in such clarity. It also gives unbelieveable color in prints. As dubed by the name when you actually see real good prints of it it looks like velvet.
Is that an Aston Martin? (going back to cars)
THere is no way to tell what kind of film somone used from a LOW RES pic off the internet. Stop trying to act like you fucking know everything.
You didnt know that its an aston martin either. heh.
1BoMeXLeX
02-06-2003, 12:33 PM
hey
but at least it sounded good
and thats really all that matters
if it bull shit.... its gotta be high quality bull shit
CPMaverick
02-06-2003, 02:01 PM
Did you know, the Aston Martins in the Bond movie were four wheel drive and had 5.0L pushrod carb engines in them. 8)
It might have been...
But, I can tell instantly the type of film they used to take the image. It's Fuji Velvia ISO50 (I used to be a big photography buff, sorry)..
That type of film really would pick up details like that in such clarity. It also gives unbelieveable color in prints. As dubed by the name when you actually see real good prints of it it looks like velvet.
Is that an Aston Martin? (going back to cars)
THere is no way to tell what kind of film somone used from a LOW RES pic off the internet. Stop trying to act like you fucking know everything.
You didnt know that its an aston martin either. heh.
Go fuck yourself....
I did photography for 3 years. Both black & white and color. Proccessed my own film and printed my own photos. So watch your ignorant fucking mouth before you go off and accuse someone of something you have no fucking clue about....
1BoMeXLeX
02-06-2003, 05:58 PM
yeah... and what boyyyie
Frosty_DUB
02-06-2003, 06:55 PM
my point is that you cant tell because its a low rez image.
ActiveAero
02-06-2003, 07:01 PM
Yeah how can you tell what kind of Film it is just by a picture on a computer screen? I'm sure there are tons of really good high quality films out there.
WiggiE
02-06-2003, 07:12 PM
Yeah how can you tell what kind of Film it is just by a picture on a computer screen? I'm sure there are tons of really good high quality films out there.
Easy, you print it out, let Tsuchia drift over it. The way it smears is the determining factor of which film. Duh, I thought everyone knew that. Come on guys it's Tsuchia.
1BoMeXLeX
02-06-2003, 07:17 PM
yuea for real
what wiggie says
i just went out and bought my second bottle
Yeah how can you tell what kind of Film it is just by a picture on a computer screen? I'm sure there are tons of really good high quality films out there.
Slow shutter speed (Blurry water, blurry trees)
Small aperture (crisp rocks approx 10 feet from the POF (point of focus)
Long exposure and small aperture so a low ISO film
Strong green and blue sensitivity
Overly strong color saturation
Very dark blacks
Crisp levels of grays
Might not sound alot to you but, there really is only about 2-4 films that actually meet every single one of those charecteristics. I would bet $30 that photo was either taken with Fujifilm Velvia(Provia/Astia) or Kodak Ektachrome.
My original guess was Velvia because it's alot more popular than Kodak and if I were to take the shot that's what I would use.
vBulletin v3.5.0, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.